Re: flight 77 black box first one ever without a serial number
2348ji23eMoon rocks
The Apollo Program collected a total of 382 kilograms of
Moon rocks during the
Apollo 11,
12,
14,
15,
16, and
17 missions. Analyses by scientists worldwide all agree that these rocks came from the Moon?no published accounts in peer-reviewed scientific journals are known that dispute this claim. The Apollo samples are easily distinguishable from both meteorites and terrestrial rocks<SUP class=reference id=cite_ref-60>
[61]</SUP> in that they show a complete lack of hydrous alteration products, they show evidence for having been subjected to impact events on an airless body, and they have unique geochemical characteristics. Furthermore, most are significantly older than the oldest rocks found on Earth (by up to 700,000,000 years). Most importantly, though, they share the same characteristics as the Soviet lunar samples that were obtained at a later date.<SUP class=reference id=cite_ref-61>
[62]</SUP>
Hoax proponents argue that
Wernher von Braun's trip to
Antarctica in 1967 (two years prior to the Apollo missions) was in order to study and/or collect
lunar meteorites to be used as fake
Moon rocks. Because von Braun was a former
SS officer (though one who had been detained by the Gestapo),<SUP class=reference id=cite_ref-62>
[63]</SUP> hoax proponents have suggested<SUP class=reference id=cite_ref-Moonhoaxcom_17-1>
[18]</SUP> that he could have been susceptible to pressure to agree to the conspiracy in order to protect himself from recriminations over the past. While NASA does not provide much information about why the MSFC Director and three others were in Antarctica at that time, it has said that the purpose was "to look into environmental and logistic factors that might relate to the planning of future space missions, and hardware".<SUP class=reference id=cite_ref-63>
[64]</SUP> An article on Sankar Chatterjee at Texas Tech University states that von Braun sent a letter to F. Alton Wade, Chatterjee's predecessor, and that "Von Braun was searching for a secretive locale to help train the United States? earliest astronauts. Wade pointed von Braun to Antarctica." Even today, NASA continues to send teams to work in
parts of Antarctica that are very dry and mimic the conditions on other planets such as
Mars and the Moon.
It is now accepted by the scientific community that rocks have been ejected from both the Martian and lunar surface during
impact events, and that some of these have landed on the Earth in the form of
Martian and
lunar meteorites.<SUP class=reference id=cite_ref-64>
[65]</SUP><SUP class=reference id=cite_ref-65>
[66]</SUP> However, the first antarctic lunar meteorite was collected in 1979, and its lunar origin was not recognized until 1982.<SUP class=reference id=cite_ref-Korotev2005_66-0>
[67]</SUP> If scientists did not already possess lunar samples to compare with, it would be difficult to conclusively prove that these meteorites were in fact derived from the Moon<SUP class="noprint Template-Fact">[
citation needed]</SUP>. Furthermore, lunar meteorites are so rare that it is very improbable that they could account for the 382 kilograms of Moon rocks that NASA obtained between 1969 and 1972. Currently, there are only about 30 kilograms of lunar meteorites in existence, even though private collectors and governmental agencies worldwide have been searching for these for more than 20 years.<SUP class=reference id=cite_ref-Korotev2005_66-1>
[67]</SUP>
Even if the Apollo Moon rocks were collected from the lunar surface, some hoax proponents argue<SUP class="noprint Template-Fact">[
citation needed]</SUP> that they were collected robotically. However, the large combined mass of the Apollo samples makes this scenario implausible. While the Apollo missions obtained 382 kilograms of Moon rocks, the Soviet
Luna 16,
20, and
24 robotic sample return missions only obtained 326 grams combined (that is, less than one-thousandth as much). Indeed, current plans for a Martian sample return would only obtain about 500 grams of soil,<SUP class=reference id=cite_ref-67>
[68]</SUP> and a recently proposed
South Pole-Aitken basin sample return mission would only obtain about 1 kilogram of Moon rock.<SUP class=reference id=cite_ref-68>
[69]</SUP> If a similar technology to collect the Apollo Moon rocks was used as with the Soviet missions or modern sample return proposals, then between 300 and 2000 robotic sample return missions would be required to obtain the current mass of Moon rocks that is curated by NASA.
Concerning the composition of the Moon rocks, Kaysing asked:
Why was there no mention of gold, silver, diamonds, or other precious metals on the Moon? It was never discussed by the press or astronauts.<SUP class=reference id=cite_ref-kaysing2002_3-5>
[4]</SUP><SUP>, p. 8</SUP>
Geologists realize that gold and silver deposits on Earth are the result of the action of hydrothermal fluids concentrating the precious metals into veins of ore. Since even in 1969 water was known to be absent on the Moon, no geologist would bother discussing the possibility of finding these on the Moon in any significant quantity
