Re: We Finally SEE why PALIN is being hidden from live interviews...
There are many things at issue in this election to be "for." Such as: 1) the rule of law; 2) the United States Constitution; 3) a Supreme Court with Justices-not reactionary troglodytes; 4) getting out of Iraq yesterday; 5) attacking those who actually attacked us; 6) regulatory agencies that aren't in bed with the industry they are charged with regulating; 7) a competent executive branch--This can go on, but I think the idea has been adequately expressed.
A big +1 to the above.
To all of you folks who talk about taxes, I generally share your sentiments. Spending and taxes have been out of control. The Republicans have spent us into oblivion, even if you exclude the war. They have made the Federal government bigger, not smaller, more in your private business, not less.
As for tax rates, it all started with Bush I. Bush I raised the top rate from 28% to 31%, I think. Then came Clinton. He jacked the top rate to 39.6%. Then W lowered the top rate to 35%. If you'll notice, the top rate is still higher than it was before Clinton's increase. Why is that ok? 35% is greater than the day Clinton took office. So if there was no Clinton, W raised taxes from 31% to 35%. Why is that ok? Both Bush I and W are tax raisers compared to Reagan.
Next, many of you will talk about capital gains tax, dividend tax, estate tax,etc. While I dont believe in taxing people when they pass on money they've already paid taxes on, all of the other variations are nothing more than government engineering. Money should equal money should equal money, no matter what form it is earned in, be it labor, gains, or dividends.
Yes, the double taxation of dividends was wrong, but instead of dropping it on the investor side, it should have been dropped on the business side, allowing businesses to expense dividends, not dropping shareholder taxes on dividends.