Patrick McIrish
OCCams raZOR
No horse in this race, been reading his puck picks all the way back to when he first posted them at the RX.....
That said he made a silly declaration here. He could beat closers by a lot if he wanted to?
You don't have to focus on beating the closer, focus on being a long-term winner, if so that comes with it.
In essence his comment infers he can pick out inefficient lines but chooses not to play them unless it's some kind of demonstration for the masses??
Long-term winners don't focus on beating closers, they don't need too, that's often after-the-game tout talk.
Just win and you'll be beating closers, no special experiments are required.
No idea what his comments even mean, sounds a lot like square talk.
That said he made a silly declaration here. He could beat closers by a lot if he wanted to?
You don't have to focus on beating the closer, focus on being a long-term winner, if so that comes with it.
In essence his comment infers he can pick out inefficient lines but chooses not to play them unless it's some kind of demonstration for the masses??
Long-term winners don't focus on beating closers, they don't need too, that's often after-the-game tout talk.
Just win and you'll be beating closers, no special experiments are required.
No idea what his comments even mean, sounds a lot like square talk.