DIMEPLAYERSONLY

[BADLIEUTENANT]

Ever consistently get beat over time by someone playing 2 or 3 team parlays where they use 1,2 or 3 ML dogs most of the time ? If so, is this the type of situation where you would layoff ( agreeing that laying off should ONLY occur in very few & select situations) ?

Anyone else have thoughts or experience with this type of situation ? Don't see many posts about players using or winning these . Normally people use ML FAVS in parlays which usually come back to put a smile on the Book's face.

Why do some books offer MLs on big spreads ( over 14 in college football & over 20 in college basketball ) while others do not ? Assume the larger books can justify the risk of big dogs winning on the ML . Besides the Sooners in season opener,what ML FAV,that was more than a 20 point favorite have lost straight up ? Would also think MLs with big spreads would offset some of the risk . Always appreciate your input MR.DIMEPLAYER . Peace

 

[dimeplayersonly]

i will respond when i get a chance

 

[dimeplayersonly]

sorry.....but i dont have enough action with people parlaying m/l dogs to worry about..

my guess the percentage of players parlaying m/l dogs with the big books isnt significant enough to consider laying off either...even it they are successfull...jmo

 

[Dr. White]

Player A bets a +200 dog for $100 on a 1pm game. Player wins and bets $300 on a +200 dog at 4:15 pm. Wins again and bets $900 on a +200 dog at 8:30 pm. Wins again and asks for his $2700. Just won a 3 team parlay.
Knowledgable sportsbooks don't refuse action because it has a high payout.
They have the bankroll to cover it.
Low bankroll book might refuse.