Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

THE SHRINK · Oct 20, 2007

10-20-2007, 09:53 AM </TD><TD class=thead style="BORDER-RIGHT: #fdde82 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #fdde82 1px solid; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; BORDER-LEFT: #fdde82 0px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #fdde82 1px solid" align=right> #13 </TD></TR><TR vAlign=top><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: #fdde82 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #fdde82 0px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #fdde82 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #fdde82 0px solid" width=175>wilheim<SCRIPT type=text/javascript> vbmenu_register("postmenu_4622410", true); </SCRIPT>
wilheim@therx.com or person19481950@yahoo.com

Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Rx. dot com..
Posts: 44,863

</TD><TD class=alt1 id=td_post_4622410 style="BORDER-RIGHT: #fdde82 1px solid">

<HR style="COLOR: #fdde82" SIZE=1>The ironic part of Sportsbetting.com's involvement is they were made sacraficial lambs by EOG when they were not at all part of the group of books that experienced the correleted parlay problem.

I am certain the management at Sportsbetting.com is not very pleased with what happened to their banner at EOG just so that site could appear to be making a statement that would impress poters and nothng else.

They never was a dispute lodged anywhere that I know of from any player at Sportsbetting.com involving the confiscating of funds for placing correleted parlays. Their only sin was to be listed amoung the long list of books owened in part by Janzette Enterprises (now called Jassy I guess)

Instead EOG burnt a bridge with an old and loyal sponser that has supported TheRx.com going as far back as I can remember and EOG from it's inception.

Personally I feel they are owed an apology by EOG's management.

I know this sounds like I am making this an issue about mismanagement by EOG but the truth is I am simply pointing out that sometimes things are not always what they appear to be. The management and employess at Sportsbetting.com were paying to advertise at EOG and conducting business as usual when suddenly they wee thrown uder the proverbial bus by EOG just so that site could say see we won't tolerate this kind of thing. I will bet anyone a dollar to a donut they would never have done the same thing with BetUS.

Sportsbetting.com were merely innocent victims of more of this ridiculous interforum one-upmanship that only hurts the forums and their sponsors but more importantly the players at Sportsbetting.com who one minute felt comfortable trusting their funds at that book and all of a sudden Sportsbetting.com becomes pesona non grata while a book like BetUS continues to be supported by that site.

Say what you want about the Rx.com but we absolutely refused to accept BetUS when they applied for sponsorship in 2006.

Getting back to Sportsbetting.com:

Sportsbetting.com along with BetUSA have the following criteria regarding correleted parlays:

Correlated parlay betting: The results of certain events can be considered to be correlated. For example, in college football betting on a heavy underdog (eg 35 point underdog) and the under in the game is statistically correlated. If players consistently bet correlated parlays then management reserves the right to regrade wagers. Wagers will be split so that half the stake will go on the pointspread and half on the under in the game. This rule applies from 19 October 2007. This will only apply to those regularly staking $50 or more on parlays and is intended only to limit professional bettors who consistently bet correlated parlays.

The goal here at The Rx.com is to see tihs criteria posted at Sportsbook.com as well as soon as possible.

In the meantime the 31 players effected by the previous ruling now have the opportunity to have their funds restored simply be contacting expidite@sportsbook.com and pleading their case.

I know I am going to get criticised for posting this and be accused of creating interforum drama myself (something I try to avoid whenever possible) but at this point what difference does it make. There is not much more negative things that can be said about me..

Regarding Sportsbook.com and charges that players cannot recover losses prior to Sept. 1st. That charge is actually meaningless because the correlated parlay is predominately a college football and to some extent college basketball phenomena. Pro football for example will never have a line such as the one qouted above where there is a 35 point underdog and baseball is also an entirely different animal when it comes to correlated parlays.

So basically except for a few college football games that were played in August any player who was penalised for playing correlated parlays now has recourse to get re-imbursed if they are one of the few (31 out of thousands) of Sportsbook.com players that had funds confiscated. Please remember many were warned beforehand.

Sure I know why have software that allows the parlays to be played in the first place, good question and now thanks to this incident one that has been resolved.

I have already been on the phone today at around 7:15AM RMT with Sportsbook.com regarding the single case I have in mediation that was submitted before the expidite@sportsbook.com re-course was created. I hope to have good news for that player later today.

Thanks, wil..
__________________
Head Moderator
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

This post was just made at the TheRx.com and once again, wilheim is attacking EOG and yours truly for taking down a sports book that falls under the umbrella of the Sportsbook.com family...

wil,

I don't have the luxury to replying to you over there, so I will do so here...

First of all, you haven't a clue about what has been transpiring since we took down Sportsbetting.com, so let me fill you in...

Bill Dozer from SBR, as well as The General and Yours Truly have been in daily communications with Sportsbetting.com.

In fact, I also learned during this process that SBR Bill has some pending cases that need to be resolved with Sportsbetting.com and I am waiting for a very important question to be answered by them to decide whether or not we will even consider putting Sportsbetting.com back on EOG...

1-Does Sportsbetting.com pay Sportsbook.com a nominal amount for software or does Sportsbetting.com pay Sportsbook.com a % of players losses?

Without knowing the answer , the SAFE course of action after <b>talking with and working with SBR thoroughly</b> was and still is to take down Sportsbetting.com until this question and other pending cases we weren't aware of are resolved...

Now as far as Sportsbook.com is concerned, our opinion hasn't wavered...

Posters all over the Internet see you, Rick and TheRx trying to spin this as a forum drama...

EOG NEVER mentioned anything about your fledgling place until you opened up your desperate attack...

Enough said...

THE SHRINK

Neverbeanother7 · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

Just further proves how much of an idiot Wil is.:+whipping

Btw, How many times did the great brown noser from the north Sportsavant post something like "Great post" or "Right as usual Wil".Ususally every Wil thread contains it....:LMAO

IDENTITY · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

wil is upset cause eog is passing up the rx.

OMNIVOROUS FROG · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

My ol pal wil, the judas goat. This is the old diversion tactic he does so well. Don't look at the RX backing a theft, look at EOG burning a loyal sponsor. That's why posters are leaving and coming to the EOG wil. Hey, at least they got rick to quit posting. That works as well as trying to carry 50 lbs. of rocks in a wet paper bag.

Best Wishes...OF :doh1

Walther Whalker · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

For example, in college football betting on a heavy underdog (eg 35 point underdog) and the under in the game is statistically correlated.

Isn't that like saying the FAVORITE to the OVER is correlated in every game?

In any event, the sportsbook should program its software not to accept the bets that it labels as "correlated." Simple.

The sportsbook knowingly accepts a bet and knows it will cancel any winners...obviously a scam. Good move by dumping the shitbook.

Bill Dozer · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

For the record, Sportsbetting.com has followed the decision of Sportsbook.com in the past and we have dealt with Sportingbet/Jazette regarding Sportsbetting issues. Ken put SBR in touch with Sportsbetting's decison maker and may have saved them from the group downgrade. SBR is now speaking with Sportsbetting about past decisons by the group and the status of the book since World Gaming purchased it late 05. We hope to help them avoid mistakes made by Jazette from here on.

RalphJ · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

Their entire group has had issues since their inception. Bottom line is....you accept a bet, you honor it, win or lose. Don't put a rule in writing then have your software accept those very type of bets that are said to be "not accepted". Any idiot can have their software tweeked to do whatever they wish. Why would a family of sportsbooks as large as the Gazette group not be able to fix their software to coincide with their rules??

Now, for this other horseshit. I've been one of the Shrink's biggest critics in accepting advertising from other than A,B, or C sportsbooks. But WTF, damned if he does and damned it he doesn't. He went to bat for the players here, and I'll bet you "a dollar to a doughnut" that if it wasn't for both EOG and SportsbookReview that these "good folks" from the Jazzette family wouldn't even be considering "listening" to complaints....as they all of a sudden are.

The Prophet · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

Bill Dozer said:
For the record, Sportsbetting.com has followed the decision of Sportsbook.com in the past and we have dealt with Sportingbet/Jazette regarding Sportsbetting issues. Ken put SBR in touch with Sportsbetting's decison maker and may have saved them from the group downgrade. SBR is now speaking with Sportsbetting about past decisons by the group and the status of the book since World Gaming purchased it late 05. We hope to help them avoid mistakes made by Jazette from here on.

MAY have SAVED them from a D+ downgrade? :+clueless

What a relief that may turnout to be.

:+signs3-1

.

OMNIVOROUS FROG · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

Would be horrible to have same rating as BOS. I am in the wrong thread or did it just take a wrong turn, I thought this was the wil don't tell us how to run our business thread, not the we dumped them as a sponsor thread.

Best Wishes...OF :+clueless

ZZ CREAM · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

RalphJ said:
Their entire group has had issues since their inception. Bottom line is....you accept a bet, you honor it, win or lose. Don't put a rule in writing then have your software accept those very type of bets that are said to be "not accepted". Any idiot can have their software tweeked to do whatever they wish. Why would a family of sportsbooks as large as the Gazette group not be able to fix their software to coincide with their rules??

Now, for this other horseshit. I've been one of the Shrink's biggest critics in accepting advertising from other than A,B, or C sportsbooks. But WTF, damned if he does and damned it he doesn't. He went to bat for the players here, and I'll bet you "a dollar to a doughnut" that if it wasn't for both EOG and SportsbookReview that these "good folks" from the Jazzette family wouldn't even be considering "listening" to complaints....as they all of a sudden are.

Very well said!:thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup Good Job EOG!:thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup

Timetopay · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

Where is that thread? Trying to post in it and cant find it

THE SHRINK · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

The plot thickens...

Someone from RX apparently deleted Wilheim's amusing post, another poster catches it, but nobody from RX has yet to reply to the poster in almost an hour...:whatever: :hung

You can't make this stuff up!

10-20-2007, 11:19 AM </TD><TD class=thead style="BORDER-RIGHT: #fdde82 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #fdde82 1px solid; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; BORDER-LEFT: #fdde82 0px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #fdde82 1px solid" align=right> #13 </TD></TR><TR vAlign=top><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: #fdde82 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #fdde82 0px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #fdde82 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #fdde82 0px solid" width=175>vinividivinci<SCRIPT type=text/javascript> vbmenu_register("postmenu_4622793", true); </SCRIPT>
RX Senior

Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: my office
Posts: 2,786

</TD><TD class=alt1 id=td_post_4622793 style="BORDER-RIGHT: #fdde82 1px solid">

<HR style="COLOR: #fdde82" SIZE=1>What happened to the post from Wil requesting an apology from EOG? Please tell me we are not editing/deleting posts made by the head moderator.

Respectfully submitted,

VVV
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

Topflight · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

Is Wilheim the guy with the mail order bride? Pretty sure thats what I heard, pathetic you have to buy a women.

Timetopay · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

I tried to be kind to him today and he still tried to bury me.

Just cant figure out what hes thinking sometimes...

world traveler · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

i have spoken to employees of numerous operations here in cr and EVERYONE without exception has stated that there exisits a feature built into the software that allows the book to accept or not accept coorelated parlays. It is located in the profile section of each line set. These softwares usually let you create many different lne sets and you can place individual accounts or group accounts together into certain line sets. Its one of the first steps the lines maker is supposed to take when setting up a line set.
This stinks of one of 2 things.....when the book took those aditional sites under management the previous management removed this option allowing correlated parlays to happen and the current management of these sites never bothered to check, or some dummy in the lines making dept. did not understand what coorelated parlays means and deselected this option. Blocking coorelated parlays IS THE DEFAULT SETTING for virtually ALL legit software out there so this was done on purpose.
Personally i dont think the current management did it on purpose as a way to cheat players but i do stronly suspect that the old management teams did it on purpose to make the new guys look bad, or get in on some of the profits as they were now out of work.
The only software that i could not confirm has this parlay option is the IQL pirated version, and thats becasue no one i talked to would admit to haveing priated software.

sean1 · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

Anyone else see the flaw in the BetUSA and Sportsbetting new rules? I am fairly sure I can run up 5+ figure balances only betting $49...

Either program your software to take the bets you want and deny the others or leave the business.

I'll also bet ya if you call in a $500 or $1000 at sportsbook.com on a big fave and over that the clerk accepts it... Then what?

Sean

OMNIVOROUS FROG · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

Topflight said:
Is Wilheim the guy with the mail order bride? Pretty sure thats what I heard, pathetic you have to buy a women.

I despise wil more than anyone on Earth, but this is not right. Stick with the forum stuff, don't drag the man's personal life into it. She could be a wonderful person. Cheap shot there.

Best Wishes...OF :cheers

OMNIVOROUS FROG · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

THE SHRINK said:
The plot thickens...

Someone from RX apparently deleted Wilheim's amusing post, another poster catches it, but nobody from RX has yet to reply to the poster in almost an hour...:whatever: :hung

You can't make this stuff up!

<TABLE class=tborder id=post4622793 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=thead style="BORDER-RIGHT: #fdde82 0px solid; BORDER-TOP: #fdde82 1px solid; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; BORDER-LEFT: #fdde82 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #fdde82 1px solid"> 10-20-2007, 11:19 AM </TD><TD class=thead style="BORDER-RIGHT: #fdde82 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #fdde82 1px solid; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; BORDER-LEFT: #fdde82 0px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #fdde82 1px solid" align=right>#13 </TD></TR><TR vAlign=top><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: #fdde82 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #fdde82 0px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #fdde82 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #fdde82 0px solid" width=175>vinividivinci<SCRIPT type=text/javascript> vbmenu_register("postmenu_4622793", true); </SCRIPT>
RX Senior

Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: my office
Posts: 2,786

</TD><TD class=alt1 id=td_post_4622793 style="BORDER-RIGHT: #fdde82 1px solid">
<HR style="COLOR: #fdde82" SIZE=1>What happened to the post from Wil requesting an apology from EOG? Please tell me we are not editing/deleting posts made by the head moderator.

Respectfully submitted,

VVV

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

He spent all that time trying to create a diversion and that could not have been any worse of a move than letting rick post. Can a head mod put himself on post review to keep from doing that? On second thought, nevermind, great job wil, luv ya man. Froggie!

Best Wishes...OF

Chuck Luck · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

sorry Ken about this post but.................

Wil is and always been a spineless dick.

THE SHRINK · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

Almost 2 hours go by and suddenly Rick A comes on to reply for wilheim (see copy and paste of his post below)...

One of them is LYING but who? :+clueless

Rick now claims that it doesn't matter to The almighty Rx what EOG does...

But meanwhile less than 2 hours earlier, wilheim HAD posted some stuff in same thread implying strongly that it does matter...

"Personally I feel they are owed an apology by EOG's management.

I know this sounds like I am making this an issue about mismanagement by EOG but the truth is I am simply pointing out that sometimes things are not always what they appear to be. The management and employess at Sportsbetting.com were paying to advertise at EOG and conducting business as usual when suddenly they wee thrown uder the proverbial bus by EOG just so that site could say see we won't tolerate this kind of thing..... "

Dear Wil, Rick, and anyone else from RX UPPER echelon,

Can't we focus on the main issue and stop spinning?

The truth NO MATTER HOW YOU spin it is SPORTSBOOK.COM is STILL IN STIFF MODE...

And if players are fortunate enough to get their money back, you can rest assured it had everything to do with the efforts of posters seeing through this blatant robbery and cover up, as well as efforts of SBR and us, but certainly not THERX who is still proudly waving SPORTSBOOK.COM banners and confusing/alienating their own posters...

10-20-2007, 01:03 PM </TD><TD class=thead style="BORDER-RIGHT: #fdde82 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #fdde82 1px solid; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; BORDER-LEFT: #fdde82 0px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #fdde82 1px solid" align=right> #23 </TD></TR><TR vAlign=top><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: #fdde82 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #fdde82 0px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #fdde82 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #fdde82 0px solid" width=175>RickA<SCRIPT type=text/javascript> vbmenu_register("postmenu_4623318", true); </SCRIPT>
Rx. General Manager

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bushwood CC
Posts: 646

</TD><TD class=alt1 id=td_post_4623318 style="BORDER-RIGHT: #fdde82 1px solid">

<HR style="COLOR: #fdde82" SIZE=1>Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">Originally Posted by vinividivinci

What happened to the post from Wil requesting an apology from EOG? Please tell me we are not editing/deleting posts made by the head moderator.

Respectfully submitted,

VVV
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
I was going to let Wil answer - but I think he is off line.

Wil made the post and then had second thoughts about making this an us vs them issue. It doesn't really matter to us what EOG does, or the reasons they do it.

I've been trying to keep an eye on these threads, but I never saw the post until it had been deleted. I didn't think it was up that long.

Thanks
Rick
</TD></TR><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: #fdde82 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #fdde82 0px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #fdde82 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #fdde82 1px solid">

</TD><TD class=alt1 style="BORDER-RIGHT: #fdde82 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #fdde82 0px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #fdde82 0px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #fdde82 1px solid" align=right></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

The General · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

It doesn't really matter to us what EOG does, or the reasons they do it.

:+textinb3 :+textinb3 :+textinb3 :+textinb3

Chuck Luck · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

LIKE THE MODS HAVE TOLD ME ABOUT DEALING WITH MR. C.......

IGNORE THE IDIOITS. KEN, IN A FEW MORE YEARS/MONTHS YOU WILL BE ABLE TO BUY IT BACK IN A GARAGE SALE.:cheers

LOVE EVERYONE AT THIS PLACE.

FEELS LIKE FAMILY UNLIKE THAT SHITHOLE

OMNIVOROUS FROG · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

The first step in damage control is diversion. Point somewhere else, anywhere else, to take the focus of of you. They already tried spin mode but that failed miserably. So they act like they are fighting for one member, and say look at what the EOG did! It appears that sometimes we all do not work together.

Best Wishes...OF :cheers

THE SHRINK · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=3 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">It doesn't really matter to us what EOG does, or the reasons they do it.</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=3 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">I think this is a good example of letting the lines of communications work before making any rash decisions. </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

Both of these statements which are contradicting one another were made by <b>Rick</b> within hours of the other on the SAME thread.

Someone needs to tell this guy to stop posting before I begin feeling sorry for him...

Bring back Marty!

He was funny..

THE SHRINK

Timetopay · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

How the fuck can you write a book like that and than have 2nd thoughts???

Wouldnt you usually have 2nd thoughts while you wrote that much.

OMNIVOROUS FROG · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

Timetopay said:
How the fuck can you write a book like that and than have 2nd thoughts???

Wouldnt you usually have 2nd thoughts while you wrote that much.

When you are trying to put out the infernos rick started you try anything, and probably lose a little focus. i used to torment wil everytime he would try to defend BOS, but he was never this bad. Just average. Now, he is remedial at best. Post challeged? Thought impaired? Don't matter, not many left to read it anyway.

Best wishes...OF :cheers

wrigley · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

Journeyman do you still have access to the RX board room:+textinb3 boy it be fun to be a fly on the wall in there I bet shit is really hitting the fan

world traveler · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

i dont see why anyone should be surprised that therx have taken the books side on this, they are outright owned by a sportsbook so naturally they are going to slant that way.

now mods deleting mods threads is just too funny and speaks volumes.

ArthurSpooner · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

Wilheim strikes me as the type of guy who would do anything for a buck, including abandoning his beliefs.

Egg Yolk Soup · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

Timetopay said:
I tried to be kind to him today and he still tried to bury me.

Just cant figure out what hes thinking sometimes...

i read that post sir, he likes to humiliate , that is why i left 2 years ago.

-soup :whatever:

Neverbeanother7 · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

ArthurSpooner said:
Wilheim strikes me as the type of guy who would do anything for a buck, including abandoning his beliefs.

Amen brother!!!!!:cheers

Ball Rash · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

ArthurSpooner said:
Wilheim strikes me as the type of guy who would do anything for a buck, including abandoning his beliefs.

probably a degenerate gambler that can't pick a winner if it hit em in the face

just guessing of course:+clueless

ersamuels2007 · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

The "Offshore Industry" is upside down. The Shrink is now posting his comments on EOG rather than his namesake portal that he founded more than a decade ago. Isn't Wilheim, the moderator who looks just like Bruce Willis, and is married to a mail-order bride, the former employee of Dr. Ken? This Rick A guy, wasn't he the same guy that used to hold the line on DB for a few extra moments while people like the Shrink and BW could "get down" before the steam came across the board???? Now, Rick A is relegated to "holding" comments back made by his pre-ejaculative moderators on the RX. And where is the "infamous Marty J" while all of this is going down? He didn't even want to take the heat of anyone knowing he owned a gambling portal, and when he did, he had BOS shoved so unmercifully and publicly up his a$$, so he signed up RICK A as designated tree to hide behind.

idiotspayforpick · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

Shrink/Gen,

As you to gentleman know, what you provide is for entertainment and insight. We all post here, bash each other, have a few laughs, and hopefully provide a few winners in the mix.

The funny part about watching dogs chase their tails, is in fact they keep spinning in circles. Once they do catch their tails, and lay down on the rug to cherrish their catch, they realize it stinks.

I know you boys don't sweat them anymore than most of us here sweat a backdoor cover.

You keep doing the right thing and let everything else take care of itself.

Out!

Hal01 · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

ersamuels2007 said:
Isn't Wilheim, the moderator who looks just like Bruce Willis,

You've never seen him, have you.:+clueless

DrunkHorseplayer · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

sean1 said:
Anyone else see the flaw in the BetUSA and Sportsbetting new rules? I am fairly sure I can run up 5+ figure balances only betting $49...

Either program your software to take the bets you want and deny the others or leave the business.

I'll also bet ya if you call in a $500 or $1000 at sportsbook.com on a big fave and over that the clerk accepts it... Then what?

Sean

That's exactly what I thought; bet $49 on every correlated parlay and you still destroy them. These monkeys should learn the golden rule: you book the bet, you pay the bet.

THE SHRINK · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

<TABLE class=tborder id=post4624747 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=thead style="BORDER-RIGHT: #fdde82 0px solid; BORDER-TOP: #fdde82 1px solid; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; BORDER-LEFT: #fdde82 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #fdde82 1px solid">

10-20-2007, 07:05 PM </TD><TD class=thead style="BORDER-RIGHT: #fdde82 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #fdde82 1px solid; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; BORDER-LEFT: #fdde82 0px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #fdde82 1px solid" align=right> #70 </TD></TR><TR vAlign=top><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: #fdde82 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #fdde82 0px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #fdde82 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #fdde82 0px solid" width=175>jcapone<SCRIPT type=text/javascript> vbmenu_register("postmenu_4624747", true); </SCRIPT>
RX Junior

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: london
Posts: 2

</TD><TD class=alt1 id=td_post_4624747 style="BORDER-RIGHT: #fdde82 1px solid">

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I am one of those who got robbed. I was never warned (obviously) and know let's see what happens
<HR style="COLOR: #fdde82" SIZE=1><TT><TT>Dear xxxxxxx,

Thank you for contacting us.

Unfortunately, Management has made the decision and it can not be
reversed. There is nothing more that we can do and further correspondance on
this issue will not be entertained. Our apologies for this unfortunate
issue.

We are always here to help you. Please feel free to reply to this email
if you have any additional questions in relation to this or any other
matter.

Kind regards,

Declan Johnson

No surprise, why should they give back stolen money?</TT></TT>
<TT><TT>
Exit question Does the figure on RX's sheet give them dredit for this stolen money?

</TT></TT>
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

Looks like Sportsbook.com isn't budging...

wrigley · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

THE SHRINK said:
<TABLE class=tborder id=post4624747 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=thead style="BORDER-RIGHT: #fdde82 0px solid; BORDER-TOP: #fdde82 1px solid; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; BORDER-LEFT: #fdde82 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #fdde82 1px solid"> 10-20-2007, 07:05 PM </TD><TD class=thead style="BORDER-RIGHT: #fdde82 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #fdde82 1px solid; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; BORDER-LEFT: #fdde82 0px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #fdde82 1px solid" align=right>#70 </TD></TR><TR vAlign=top><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: #fdde82 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #fdde82 0px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #fdde82 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #fdde82 0px solid" width=175>jcapone<SCRIPT type=text/javascript> vbmenu_register("postmenu_4624747", true); </SCRIPT>
RX Junior

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: london
Posts: 2

</TD><TD class=alt1 id=td_post_4624747 style="BORDER-RIGHT: #fdde82 1px solid">

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I am one of those who got robbed. I was never warned (obviously) and know let's see what happens
<HR style="COLOR: #fdde82" SIZE=1><TT><TT>Dear xxxxxxx,

Thank you for contacting us.

Unfortunately, Management has made the decision and it can not be
reversed. There is nothing more that we can do and further correspondance on
this issue will not be entertained. Our apologies for this unfortunate
issue.

We are always here to help you. Please feel free to reply to this email
if you have any additional questions in relation to this or any other
matter.

Kind regards,

Declan Johnson

No surprise, why should they give back stolen money?</TT></TT>
<TT><TT>
Exit question Does the figure on RX's sheet give them dredit for this stolen money?

</TT></TT>

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

Looks like Sportsbook.com isn't budging...

Declan Johnson sounds like such a caring person to:+textinb3

We are always here to help you. Please feel free to reply to this email
if you have any additional questions in relation to this or any other
matter.

Kind regards,

Declan Johnson

IDENTITY · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

LOL

wrigley · Oct 20, 2007

Re: Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

wrigley said:
Declan Johnson sounds like such a caring person to:+textinb3

We are always here to help you. Please feel free to reply to this email
if you have any additional questions in relation to this or any other
matter.

Kind regards,

Declan Johnson

But yet at the begining of the letter he is told to F-off so which is it?

A or B:+clueless

A.There is nothing more that we can do and further correspondance on this issue will not be entertained. Our apologies for this unfortunate issue.

B.We are always here to help you. Please feel free to reply to this email if you have any additional questions in relation to this or any other matter.

Kind regards,

Declan Johnson

Wilheim, don't tell us how to run our business, ok?

1

2

2

EOG Master

EOG Addicted

EOG Member

2

EOG Dedicated

EOG Master

EOG Master

EOG Master

1

EOG Addicted

EOG Master

EOG Addicted

EOG Dedicated

EOG Master

EOG Master

2

1

Another Day, Another Dollar

2

EOG Master

1

EOG Master

EOG Master

2

EOG Addicted

2

EOG Senior Member

2

2

EOG Member

EOG Dedicated

EOG Veteran

EOG Addicted

1

2

2

2