EOG Is NOT Signing Off On BETUS/MYFOOTBALLGAME Deal...

First off, I feel TERRIBLE that a player who was ROBBED out of 25k from a sports book would have to send even MORE MONEY to this same sports book, then roll it over umpteen times in order to collect money that was RIGHTFULLY HIS!!!!!

I was not even AWARE that EOG was mentioned until a prominent poster emailed me about this debacle late last night...

Also, if EOG is going to be involved in any aspect of this dispute, then we should be afforded every privilege to POST our OPINION where this is occurring. Sadly, both the General and I don't have posting privileges at TheRx, so we can't even defend ourselves or confirm or deny our positions when our names are used without proper consent...

But back to the MAIN POINT, EOG is not going to SIGN OFF on anything unless this gambler gets PAID IN FULL by BETUS with NO STRINGS attached...

Back when the dispute first took place, I did whatever I could to get the player SOME of his money back, but I FIRMLY believe he deserved a better fate back then, and certainly he derserves a better one today...

Therefore, EOG'S OFFICIAL POSITION is very clear: anything other than a TOTAL REIMBURESEMENT IN FULL to the gambler named MYFOOTBALLGAME is not acceptable for us...

EOG will NOT be SIGNING off on this current agreement, period. And it would be only ethical to ask ME the next time you throw out our NAME on an agreement!

THE SHRINK
 
X

xpanda

Guest
You have to wonder, if this deal were honourable and in the player's favour, would the Rx be willing to give General and yourself credit for helping resolve it? Or, in this case, are they hoping to lend this trainwreck some credibility by attaching General's name to it, since the deal REEKS to high heaven?

Bush-league and trite, in my opinion.

Imagine being mugged and the mugger saying he'll give you back your wallet if you give him your watch to hold on to? WTF kind of deal is that?
 

The General

Another Day, Another Dollar
I want no part of this deal. I told Mike I would look it over, but when I read it, I lost all interest. I have learned my lessons about deals. Neither party can guarantee enforcement fully. The player is to send 10 or possibly 20 thousand dollars back to a sports book which robbed him. :+clueless

Then he is not allowed to talk about them, their sisters, their janitor, their odds, website, etc... negatively, ever again?

You guys enjoy this. I am trying to simplify life as I get older, not make it more difficult.
 

JC

EOG Veteran
Kudos to EOG, Shrink, and General for not signing off on this charade. If MFG wants to do this it's his business, but it should not come with the endorsement of legitimate watchdog sites.

This is what I posted at the Rx:

MFG has rolled his original deposit and bonus over many more times than the original terms, even if you use their crooked method of counting.

I find it reprehensible that any watchdog site would give this agreement any sort of respect.

I don't see what the player is getting. I don't see what sending 10K with a 65% bonus with ridiculous restrictions has to do with his 25K??? He is not getting his 25K back, this deal is something new.
 

Chuck Sims

EOG Dedicated
According to this bogus deal, MFG could end up sending $40,000 to BetUs. He would then get what amounts to nothing more than a bonus. If MFG loses the $40,000 + bonus, BetUs will then be entitled to say the 25k they stole 3? years ago is paid in full. Nobody in their right mind would sign off on this. All the watchdog sites should do if MFG goes through with this is to monitor the situation and hopefully to insure BetUs does'nt stiff MFG again.
 
Remember this book hired Jesse Ventura, Why dont they use his current picture how he looks today instead of his governor one in their ads.



 

homedog

EOG Enthusiast
THE SHRINK said:
First off, I feel TERRIBLE that a player who was ROBBED out of 25k from a sports book would have to send even MORE MONEY to this same sports book, then roll it over umpteen times in order to collect money that was RIGHTFULLY HIS!!!!!

I was not even AWARE that EOG was mentioned until a prominent poster emailed me about this debacle late last night...

Also, if EOG is going to be involved in any aspect of this dispute, then we should be afforded every privilege to POST our OPINION where this is occurring. Sadly, both the General and I don't have posting privileges at TheRx, so we can't even defend ourselves or confirm or deny our positions when our names are used without proper consent...

But back to the MAIN POINT, EOG is not going to SIGN OFF on anything unless this gambler gets PAID IN FULL by BETUS with NO STRINGS attached...

Back when the dispute first took place, I did whatever I could to get the player SOME of his money back, but I FIRMLY believe he deserved a better fate back then, and certainly he derserves a better one today...

Therefore, EOG'S OFFICIAL POSITION is very clear: anything other than a TOTAL REIMBURESEMENT IN FULL to the gambler named MYFOOTBALLGAME is not acceptable for us...

EOG will NOT be SIGNING off on this current agreement, period. And it would be only ethical to ask ME the next time you throw out our NAME on an agreement!

THE SHRINK

This will have as much affect on BetUS as the TOW panel's decision had on Olympic. Nice try anyway Shrink.
 

Chuck Sims

EOG Dedicated
Hopefully EOG with the SHRINK at the helm can gain some kind of power over sportsbooks that decide they will stiff bettors and contiune to advertise as if business as usual.
 

homedog

EOG Enthusiast
Chuck Sims said:
Hopefully EOG with the SHRINK at the helm can gain some kind of power over sportsbooks that decide they will stiff bettors and contiune to advertise as if business as usual.

Okay. :+thumbs-2
 
X

xpanda

Guest
homedog said:
This will have as much affect on BetUS as the TOW panel's decision had on Olympic. Nice try anyway Shrink.

The point of Ken's isn't to try and sway BetUs at this stage, but to make clear to the other forums that throwing EOG into the mix of sites involved in this is simply not factual. If they want to make deals for players like this, that's their prerogative, but leave us out of it unless we actually ARE involved.
 

homedog

EOG Enthusiast
The point of it is that you were not involved and therefore can try to make yourself look good by posting this b.s.
 

Chuck Sims

EOG Dedicated
homedog, EOG was mentioned as being involved. The bettor being stiffed mentioned several sites, one being the General of the watchdog site EOG that he was waiting for their sign off on this bullshit deal. As soon as the SHRINK caught wind of this, well, you read his response.
 
I would love to see Shrink ask all these top notch books he has here to take down their ads from sites that promote stiffs like Betus.
But I think that would be pushing it..lol
 
X

xpanda

Guest
Chuck Sims said:
homedog, EOG was mentioned as being involved. The bettor being stiffed mentioned several sites, one being the General of the watchdog site EOG that he was waiting for their sign off on this bullshit deal. As soon as the SHRINK caught wind of this, well, you read his response.

Thanks, Chuck.

Homedog, in case you missed it:

MFG over at the Rx: said:
Representatives of each of the following sites agree in writing that they fully support this agreement and have spoken to MFG and have confirmed that he clearly understands the terms and agrees that the agreement is final. Sites required to participate will be: TheRx (Wilheim), MW (Russ), EOG (General Pete) and SBR (Bill Dozer).

Neither EOG nor General are involved in this.<!-- / message -->
 

TOW

EOG Enthusiast
Nothing new under the sun..... these betus boys like to change, add, subtract at their liking without necessarily talking to the ones allegedly involved.

I liked the initital agreement cause both MFG and them were supposed to post up with a trusted third party....they reneged it at the last minute cause they say "they are good for the money"..... there's a vendor of theirs stiffed out of 160K this past September that thinks otherwise...
 
X

xpanda

Guest
Haven't a clue, Santo. The same post says that Major needs to sign off on the deal, too, but from what I was reading at the Rx, it sounds like he's not impressed with the deal, either (though likely he thinks the book is somehow getting the shaft here.)

If Roberto doesn't like it, Russ thinks it's too generous, and EOG has nothing to do with it, that just leaves SBR.
 

JC

EOG Veteran
Roberto,

What do you like about the deal if he put the money with a third party? The man deposited $15,000, got $7,500 in matchplay and rolled $400,000 ($300,000) by their crooked counting method.

Why should he have to play one more penny of action there? They stole his money.
 

TOW

EOG Enthusiast
Jay,

In a perfect world you would be 100% right. Unfortunately the world is less than perfect, as you well know.

If completion of the rollover requirement is the key to have this dispute finally settled, and given past and present circumstances, I would have felt considerably better if money was held by a major and trusted bookmaker instead of them.

When they reneged this string, which they initially proposed and agreed to, I nixed the past deal.

This is why I'm glad I'm not invited to sign off on this one, because I would have NOT agreed to it unless BOTH parties money was held by the third party.
 
xpanda said:
The same post says that Major needs to sign off on the deal, too, but from what I was reading at the Rx, it sounds like he's not impressed with the deal, either (though likely he thinks the book is somehow getting the shaft here.)

If Roberto doesn't like it, Russ thinks it's too generous, and EOG has nothing to do with it, that just leaves SBR.

You got to be kidding me. Did he actually say that the Betus was too generous in this deal?

Please tell me no. I don't think much of this guy but I find it hard to believe he would say such a thing considering the facts.
 
X

xpanda

Guest
No, TT, Russ didn't actually say that at the Rx. But someone over there DID say he was hopping mad about the deal, and since Betus is an advertiser of his, I have to think he's mad at the book for giving in.

I could be wrong, though. Just using recent history as my guide.
 

The_Man

EOG Senior Member
Why would anyone post up with such a shit book like this is beyone me. I hope this guy ends up with the funds he is owed. Where is this shop located anyway?
 
Top