Re: Does a sportsbook being an advertiser here give you a sense of security ?
Not in the slightest.
Eog has allowed - and continues to allow - crap books and STIFFS to advertise. That's pretty much the end of the discussion as far as I'm concerned.
I'm sure the eog guys are nice guys who sincerely hope and wish nothing goes wrong with these books. But hopes and wishes don't buy me a lot of groceries if SBG decides to start making up rules on the fly that result in my balance being confiscated.
On a positive note, Betmania has backtracked on an old thievery and credited a player they stole from in April.
This has to be EOG's version of groovinmyhoovin....LOL
Dude before you keep forever clamoring about thievery you have to
understand the "but for" test with sites like this.
But for the advertisers there is no EOG or any other forum for that
matter. LVA is barely surviving on de minimis google ads.
If you've ever run a business you have to seriously look at any
revenue generating entity...LVA had Cascade as an advertiser for
over one year and they're for lack of better words a Ponsi operation.
They probably would still be an advertiser had the online ban not passed.
So EOG is not alone....
Shrink or any owner/operator has to make decisions to make the biz a going
concern. You can't fault them for that...
The bigger issue is how the owner handles the issue of fraud or deceit
with an advertiser once it is discovered?
I'll save that for another day....