Re: any neteller news you guys might want to go and find out about?
NETeller's Other Co-Founder John LeFebvre likely to plead guilty to conspiracy
written July 1, 2007
EOG has learned that Neteller's other founder, John LeFebvre, is already in the process of joining his partner Stephen Lawrence and pleading guilty to Conspiracy.
NETeller Plc co-founder Stephen Lawrence pled guilty on Friday in U.S. Federal Court to one count of conspiracy in the ongoing case brought against the company's founders. Along with John Lefebvre, Lawrence, 47, was arrested in January over NETeller's facilitation of money transfers between U.S. citizens and offshore gambling sites.
The details of this will be key. The charges being dropped to one count of conspiracy is pretty favorable to Mr. Lawrence.
What I really wonder is whether the one count he is pleading guilty to makes any mention of poker; remember that Neteller also foolishly funded these accounts which are clearly illegal under US law.
But, according to Antigua's recent victory at the WTO, who is to say what will happen?
One thing for sure: any time the DOJ gets what it wants in these cases it is bad for us to one degree or another.
By cooperating, they may not have to do a single day in jail. And it's not clear from the news reports how much money they will have to return.
Many US customers are concerned that this latest developments may effect their chances of getting paid out adversely.
I disagree and here is why according to an insider discussing Stephen Lawrence's plea:
1) Of course he pled guilty, that had about a 99.9% chance of happening (there's a reason for those six continuances).
2) The 100 million is from his personal funds (with the caveat of 'jointly and severably liable', but that liability will only be shared with future guilty pleaders, ie, LeFebvre).
3) Neteller has nothing to do with these fines at all, nor do our funds have anything to do with them.
4) This has been a sports betting case all along and has nothing to do with poker. this does not mean that the DOJ will not eventually go after, say, epassporte, whose founder is conveniently based in California, but it does mean that epassporte's lawyers evidently believe that poker is not a DOJ issue at this time.